[6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
FYI, RPMs for CentOS6 are here;


20.9 MB clang-6.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
689 KB clang-format-6.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
500 KB libcxx-6.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
480 KB libcxx-devel-6.0.0-1.el6.noarch.rpm
122 KB libcxxabi-6.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
12.8 MB lld-6.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

I will propose tweaks for CPack, in near future.

Takumi

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:17 PM Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Openmp-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
On 2 Mar 2018, at 13:17, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
> small x86 fix (r326393).
>
> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

Built, tested and uploaded:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.0-amd64-unknown-freebsd-10.tar.xz) = fee8352f5dee2e38fa2bb80ab0b5ef9efef578cbc6892e5c724a1187498119b7
SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.0-i386-unknown-freebsd-10.tar.xz) = 13414a66b680760171e04f32071396eb6e5a179ff0b5a067d48c4b23744840f1

On amd64-freebsd10 there were 523 unexpected test failures (down from 526 at rc3):

  Expected Passes    : 45388
  Passes With Retry  : 1
  Expected Failures  : 185
  Unsupported Tests  : 2937
  Unexpected Passes  : 1
  Unexpected Failures: 523

On i386-freebsd10 there were 246 unexpected test failures (down from 250 at rc3):

  Expected Passes    : 44232
  Expected Failures  : 194
  Unsupported Tests  : 1954
  Unexpected Passes  : 1
  Unexpected Failures: 246

-Dimitry


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

signature.asc (230 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.

4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz


On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers



--
-Brian

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way.  If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.

$ for f in ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do echo $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
readelf: Error: ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so: Failed to read file header
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0


On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <[hidden email]> wrote:

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.

4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd  clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz


On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers



--
-Brian



--
-Brian

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
 From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they
don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what
would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?

Regards,
Jonas

Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:

> It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't
> uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
> $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
> like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way.
> If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.
>
> $ for f in
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do echo
> $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
> readelf: Error:
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so: Failed
> to read file header
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
>  0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.
>>
>> 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
>> 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
>> ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear testers,
>>>
>>> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
>>> after
>>> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
>>> one
>>> small x86 fix (r326393).
>>>
>>> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.
>>>
>>> For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
>>> it
>>> will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
>>> on
>>> the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
>>> ready.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!
>>>
>>> Hans
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [1]
>>
>> --
>> -Brian
>
> --
> -Brian
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <[hidden email]> wrote:
From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory, so what would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?

Regards,
Jonas


Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:
It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't
uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
$ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way.
If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.

$ for f in
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do echo
$f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
readelf: Error:
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so: Failed
to read file header
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <[hidden email]>
wrote:

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.

4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
<[hidden email]> wrote:

Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [1]

--
-Brian

--
-Brian

Links:
------
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev



--
-Brian

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
libc++.so should be a linker script that automatically pulls in
libc++abi (see "Failed to read file header" in your output). And IIRC
libc++abi is only one possible implementation that may be used by
libc++, but I'm no expert here...

Am 2018-03-05 17:33, schrieb Brian Cain:

> Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so?
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
>> libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think
>> they don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory,
>> so what would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jonas
>>
>> Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:
>>
>> It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration
>> isn't
>> uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
>> $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
>> like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same
>> way.
>> If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.
>>
>> $ for f in
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do
>> echo
>> $f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
>> readelf: Error:
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so:
>> Failed
>> to read file header
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
>> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
>> [$ORIGIN/../lib]
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
>> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1
>>
> ./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.
>>
>> 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
>> 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
>> ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
>> clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear testers,
>>
>> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
>> after
>> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
>> one
>> small x86 fix (r326393).
>>
>> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.
>>
>> For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
>> it
>> will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
>> on
>> the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
>> ready.
>>
>> Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!
>>
>> Hans
>> _______________________________________________
>> Release-testers mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [2]
>> [1]
>>
>> --
>> -Brian
>
> --
> -Brian
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [2]
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev [3]
>
> --
> -Brian
>
> Links:
> ------
> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> [3] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Ok, yes, you're right -- thanks for clarification.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <[hidden email]> wrote:
libc++.so should be a linker script that automatically pulls in libc++abi (see "Failed to read file header" in your output). And IIRC libc++abi is only one possible implementation that may be used by libc++, but I'm no expert here...


Am 2018-03-05 17:33, schrieb Brian Cain:
Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <[hidden email]>
wrote:

From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime
libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think
they don't have a dependency on other libraries in that directory,
so what would be the advantage of having RPATH set on them?

Regards,
Jonas

Am 2018-03-05 17:23, schrieb Brian Cain via llvm-dev:

It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration
isn't
uniform among the libraries produced by the release.  Some use
$ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none.  Is this by design?  It seems
like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same
way.
If that makes sense I'll create a corresponding feature request.

$ for f in
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/lib*.so*; do
echo
$f; readelf -d $f|grep RUNPATH; done
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++abi.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libclang.so.6.0
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so
readelf: Error:
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so:
Failed
to read file header
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libc++.so.1.0
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libgomp.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libiomp5.so

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldbIntelFeatures.so.6.0.0
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/liblldb.so.6.0.0
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libLTO.so.6.0.0
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
[$ORIGIN/../lib]
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomp.so

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.rtl.x86_64.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libomptarget.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so
./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1

./clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04/lib/libunwind.so.1.0

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Brian Cain <[hidden email]>
wrote:

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries.

4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz
360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz
ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd
clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.2.tar.xz

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
<[hidden email]> wrote:

Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch
after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and
one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but
it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published
on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is
ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [2]
[1]

--
-Brian

--
-Brian

Links:
------
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers [2]
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev [3]

--
-Brian

Links:
------
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
[3] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev



--
-Brian

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Hello,

On 02/03/2018 13:17, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote:

> Dear testers,
>
> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
> small x86 fix (r326393).
>
> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.
>
> For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
> will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
> the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.
>
> Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!
>

Full green on Debian:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-6.0

I will have a look at rebuilding the Debian archive with this version (we did with rc1)
over the next month.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Hi Hans,

Looks ok here. I've uploaded the binaries.

SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 5ff062f4838ac51a3500383faeb0731440f1c4473bf892258314a49cbaa66e61
SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 39820007ef6b2e3a4d05ec15feb477ce6e4e6e90180d00326e6ab9982ed8fe82
SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz)= ff55cd0bdd0b67e22d1feee2e4c84dedc3bb053401330b64c7f6ac18e88a71f1


Thanks,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Openmp-dev [[hidden email]] on behalf of Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev [[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 12:17 PM
To: Release-testers
Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev ([hidden email]); LLDB Dev
Subject: [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dear testers,

The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
small x86 fix (r326393).

Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.

For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.

Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!

Hans
_______________________________________________
Openmp-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Dennis Luehring via cfe-dev
Hi,

ARM & AArch64 also up and ready:
fb00698f38ade92d11d1aa297daf4c6ea657560a
clang+llvm-6.0.0-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz
c4fd61dd28a90b754d0d39f3f1f2bffcd5b38e46
clang+llvm-6.0.0-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz

Cheers,
Diana

On 7 March 2018 at 19:15, Simon Dardis via cfe-dev
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Hans,
>
> Looks ok here. I've uploaded the binaries.
>
> SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 5ff062f4838ac51a3500383faeb0731440f1c4473bf892258314a49cbaa66e61
> SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 39820007ef6b2e3a4d05ec15feb477ce6e4e6e90180d00326e6ab9982ed8fe82
> SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz)= ff55cd0bdd0b67e22d1feee2e4c84dedc3bb053401330b64c7f6ac18e88a71f1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
> ________________________________________
> From: Openmp-dev [[hidden email]] on behalf of Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev [[hidden email]]
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 12:17 PM
> To: Release-testers
> Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev ([hidden email]); LLDB Dev
> Subject: [Openmp-dev] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in
>
> Dear testers,
>
> The final version of 6.0.0 has just been tagged from the branch after
> r326550. It has the same contents as -rc3 modulo release notes and one
> small x86 fix (r326393).
>
> Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp.
>
> For those following along: this means llvm-6.0.0 is complete, but it
> will take a few days to get all the tarballs ready and published on
> the web page. I will send the announcement once everything is ready.
>
> Many thanks to everyone for your hard work!
>
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Openmp-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev