10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Hi,

I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
binaries.

If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.

-Tom

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:23 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.

Windows looks good. Uploaded:

$ sha256sum LLVM-10.0.1-rc1-win*.exe
3ca57fc9b80c796a1a68f71a60d94cd5f94818b2b326efaf4e558228565cbecc
LLVM-10.0.1-rc1-win32.exe
ada2f4d596259fad9dd9efa4a14999462feb259dbecd1b7b387539d853f640f3
LLVM-10.0.1-rc1-win64.exe

They were built with the attached batch. file.

 - Hans

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

build_llvm_1001-rc1._bat_ (6K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
On 20 May 2020, at 03:22, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.

I have uploaded:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = 4dbe2041e8aa80ba2b908946052bd4bb20733422707277aa7c297980ed8cd92c
SHA256 (clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = 5fad007fdabe085de126513875a8e601b1f341889eb36423d2980dd3d34b1d80

but none of the regression tests could run, due to a lit/googletest exception:

llvm-lit: /home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/formats/googletest.py:43: warning: unable to discover google-tests in '/home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-10.0.1-rc1.obj/tools/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SPIRV/./MLIRSPIRVTests': Command '['/home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-10.0.1-rc1.obj/tools/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SPIRV/./MLIRSPIRVTests', '--gtest_list_tests']' returned non-zero exit status 1.. Process output: b''
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/formats/googletest.py", line 39, in getGTestTests
    env=localConfig.environment)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 411, in check_output
    **kwargs).stdout
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 512, in run
    output=stdout, stderr=stderr)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-10.0.1-rc1.obj/tools/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SPIRV/./MLIRSPIRVTests', '--gtest_list_tests']' returned non-zero exit status 1.

Running the MLIRSPIRVTests executable shows the actual problem:

$ /home/dim/llvm/10.0.1/rc1/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-10.0.1-rc1.obj/tools/mlir/unittests/Dialect/SPIRV/./MLIRSPIRVTests
Shared object "libc++abi.so.1" not found, required by "MLIRSPIRVTests"

On FreeBSD we use libcxxrt, not libc++abi. Does anybody have an idea why this appears to have changed between 10.0.0 and 10.0.1? And if so, how I tell the build not to link against libc++abi?

-Dimitry


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

signature.asc (230 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>

Just FYI, the sky seems to have fallen on me here.  I'm not really sure
why it worked before but a lot of parts of clang fail now due to
duplicate registered command-line options.  I will file bugs when I'm
done figuring out all the fixes but giving you an early heads-up.

--
Best regards,
Michał Górny


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

signature.asc (631 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>

Ok, it turns out my issues were due to py3.7+.  I've requested
backporting one lit patch and with it, there are no new regressions.

However, it made me notice that some clangd unittest are failing to
execute with duplicate command-line option errors but the errors are
ignored by lit.  It happens when clang is linked to dylib, and it is
non-trivial to fix and I'm not sure if I'll be able to fix it myself.
Any and all help appreciated.

I've tried to see if it is fixed in master but I can't seem to manage to
find a recent clang revision that wouldn't segfault all the way.

--
Best regards,
Michał Górny


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

signature.asc (631 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Hi,

Uploaded binaries for ARM & AArch64:
e7cdf76722c9f5b90ec3f5d0e6cf5545badc6a7eaf8477b764a25845aee9a844  clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz                                                                    
a11427f38283a522a22f4799c40518b09b72bdd4170ecb456544b459f74d1fc3  clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc1-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz 

AArch64 is green (yay! IIRC 10.0.0 had an issue). 
For ARM we still have PR44157 & PR44158 (which we also had for llvm 10.0.0), and I have also opened PR46092 and PR46093 for some new failures. I'll try to have a quick look to see if they're environment problems or if we can bisect them.

Cheers,
Diana

On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:31, Michał Górny via Release-testers <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:22 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>

Ok, it turns out my issues were due to py3.7+.  I've requested
backporting one lit patch and with it, there are no new regressions.

However, it made me notice that some clangd unittest are failing to
execute with duplicate command-line option errors but the errors are
ignored by lit.  It happens when clang is linked to dylib, and it is
non-trivial to fix and I'm not sure if I'll be able to fix it myself.
Any and all help appreciated.

I've tried to see if it is fixed in master but I can't seem to manage to
find a recent clang revision that wouldn't segfault all the way.

--
Best regards,
Michał Górny

_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Hi,

In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on
Windows with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for
debug.
See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-not-building-in-vusual-studio/1139/3

Something seems to go wrong with the debug build of llvm-tblgen.exe

This problem does not exist on the current master branch.

Machiel

On 20-May-20 03:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>
> -Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
On 05/27/2020 01:04 PM, Machiel van Hooren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on Windows with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for debug.
> See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-not-building-in-vusual-studio/1139/3
>

Can you file a bug for this?

-Tom

> Something seems to go wrong with the debug build of llvm-tblgen.exe
>
> This problem does not exist on the current master branch.
>
> Machiel
>
> On 20-May-20 03:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
>> binaries.
>>
>> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
>> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
>> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>>
>> -Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Done: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46108

Machiel

On 27-May-20 22:16, Tom Stellard wrote:

> On 05/27/2020 01:04 PM, Machiel van Hooren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on Windows with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for debug.
>> See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-not-building-in-vusual-studio/1139/3
>>
> Can you file a bug for this?
>
> -Tom
>
>> Something seems to go wrong with the debug build of llvm-tblgen.exe
>>
>> This problem does not exist on the current master branch.
>>
>> Machiel
>>
>> On 20-May-20 03:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
>>> binaries.
>>>
>>> If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
>>> to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
>>> file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>>>
>>> -Tom
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
In reply to this post by Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Does https://reviews.llvm.org/D80433 look related?

On 5/27/20, 1:07 PM, "llvm-dev on behalf of Machiel van Hooren via llvm-dev" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    Hi,

    In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on
    Windows with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for
    debug.
    See https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.discourse.group_t_llvm-2Dnot-2Dbuilding-2Din-2Dvusual-2Dstudio_1139_3&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=g7CGajTv0VLgotaIzNqJq5i3ESX5hGErtE7sk4spfmI&e= 

    Something seems to go wrong with the debug build of llvm-tblgen.exe

    This problem does not exist on the current master branch.

    Machiel

    On 20-May-20 03:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
    > binaries.
    >
    > If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
    > to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
    > file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
    >
    > -Tom
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > LLVM Developers mailing list
    > [hidden email]
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=bn5eP0yEOKwCXz0ltbSJ_7xOv98pCI09Mv8fahA2DgQ&e= 
    _______________________________________________
    LLVM Developers mailing list
    [hidden email]
    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=bn5eP0yEOKwCXz0ltbSJ_7xOv98pCI09Mv8fahA2DgQ&e= 

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Neil Nelson via cfe-dev
Yes, see the discussion here https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41367

Machiel

On 28-May-20 00:15, Shoaib Meenai wrote:

> Does https://reviews.llvm.org/D80433 look related?
>
> On 5/27/20, 1:07 PM, "llvm-dev on behalf of Machiel van Hooren via llvm-dev" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>      Hi,
>
>      In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on
>      Windows with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for
>      debug.
>      See https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.discourse.group_t_llvm-2Dnot-2Dbuilding-2Din-2Dvusual-2Dstudio_1139_3&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=g7CGajTv0VLgotaIzNqJq5i3ESX5hGErtE7sk4spfmI&e=
>
>      Something seems to go wrong with the debug build of llvm-tblgen.exe
>
>      This problem does not exist on the current master branch.
>
>      Machiel
>
>      On 20-May-20 03:22, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>      > Hi,
>      >
>      > I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release.  Testers can begin testing and uploading
>      > binaries.
>      >
>      > If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month
>      > to get your fix in.  To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch,
>      > file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug.
>      >
>      > -Tom
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > LLVM Developers mailing list
>      > [hidden email]
>      > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=bn5eP0yEOKwCXz0ltbSJ_7xOv98pCI09Mv8fahA2DgQ&e=
>      _______________________________________________
>      LLVM Developers mailing list
>      [hidden email]
>      https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=oa4tEniiDfCb4g9rXTxHHXGBH5syObZ3HC9wPL29iWU&s=bn5eP0yEOKwCXz0ltbSJ_7xOv98pCI09Mv8fahA2DgQ&e=
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev